检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学法学院,杭州310018 [2]佛山市人民检察院公诉科,广东佛山528000
出 处:《浙江工商大学学报》2014年第1期65-73,共9页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"诉讼模式转型中的制度变迁--以刑事证据;辩护;执行制度为样本"(10JJD820011)的阶段性成果
摘 要:基于我国刑事执行权配置的现状和问题,需要遵循权力制衡与效率相协调、惩罚犯罪与保障人权相统一、刑事执行权行使公开化和社会化等原则,予以进一步优化。具体构想包括:建立健全刑事执行权配置的法律规范体系,统一刑事执行工作的领导机关,革新刑事执行权配置的方式,改革与重构减刑、假释程序,强化对刑事执行权行使的检察监督。Based on the actuality and problems of the criminal executive power configuration, optimizing the criminal ex- ecutive power configuration should follow these principles, such as maintaining the balance between power and efficiency, pun- ishment and protection of human rights, being exercised openly and socially. The proposed improvements include the establish- ment of a sound criminal executive powers configuration system of legal norms, establishing integrated management system of criminal executive power, innovating the ways of exercising criminal executive power, reforming commutation and parole proce- dure, and strengthening the function of prosecutorial supervision in exercise of criminal executive power.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.212.110