论完善《合同法》中的预期违约制度  

A Research on the Legal System of Expectant Contract Breach in the Contract Law

作　　者：李莲叶[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南财经学院法律系,河南郑州450002

出　　处：《经济经纬》2001年第1期68-71,共4页Economic Survey

摘　　要：合同是市场交易最基本的法律形式。为公平地保护交易双方当事人的利益 ,合同法设定了预期违约制度 ,它源于英美法 ,大陆法在类似问题上规定了不安抗辩权制度 ,而我国《合同法》兼收并蓄 ,同时规定了两项制度 ,对此 ,需要提出的看法是 :它破坏了两项制度的原貌和完整性 ,容易造成适用上的混乱 ;预期违约制度较之不安抗辩权更为优越 ,具有公平、效益、安全等价值 ;建议尽早修订我国《合同法》 ,完善预期违约制度 ,以默示预期违约替代不安抗辩权制度 ,使预期违约这一先进制度的功能和效用在我国社会主义市场经济条件下得到完整的发挥。Contract is the fundamental legal form of the transactions in the market. It specifies the legal system of expectant breach in order to protect the interest of both parties. This legal system originates from the Common Law, while the Civil Law stipulates an insecure counterplea system. Both systems are absorbed in the Contract Law of our country. The author thinks that the absorption changes their original characteristics and damages their integrity, thus causing difficulties in practice. The legal system of expectant contract breach is superior to that of the insecure counterplea, bearing the advantages of fairness, efficiency and security. The author suggests that the Contract Law in our country be amended and expectant breach system be perfected in order to excise its functions in our socialist market economy.

关 键 词：合同法 明示预期违约 默示预期违约 不安抗辨权 预期违约制度 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]