检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邱星美[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088
出 处:《法学杂志》2014年第2期95-101,共7页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:诉的合并理论在我国民事诉讼法学体系中是非常薄弱的环节。诉的合并制度在我国民事诉讼法立法上有缺失及空白,预备的诉的合并尤为如此。诉讼实务中涉及客观的预备的诉的合并问题屡见不鲜。立法上的缺失与空白导致适用的无序、司法资源的重复浪费和当事人的诉累。学理研究的孱弱远不足以为修法提供理论支撑,诉的合并问题成为修法的盲点,应予重视。The theory of consolidated action is regarded as a vulnerable spot of the Chinese civil procedure jurisprudence system. Though deficiency relating to the joinder of actions exists in the legislation of the civil procedure law, in the field of preliminary joinder it is even more conspicuous. The number of problems involving consolidated action in litigation practice is numerous and because of the legislative deficiency these problems could lead to the chaos of litigation, the waste of judicial resources and the fatigue of parties in action. The weak and incompetent academic research in this area fails to provide theoretical support for law revision and makes it a blind spot. Thus it becomes a matter which shall be attached more importance to in further study.
关 键 词:诉的合并 客观的诉的合并 客观的预备的诉的合并
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28