“一祖三宗”说与陈简斋的诗学定位  

The Notion of ‘ One Ancestor Developed into Three Predecessors' and the Orientation of Chen Jianzhai's Poetics

作　　者：吴淑钿[1] 

机构地区：[1]香港浸会大学

出　　处：《学术研究》2014年第2期135-144,160,共10页Academic Research

摘　　要：陈与义是南北宋间重要诗人,诗作成就在南宋已受肯定,被称"新体"与"陈简斋体"。元代方回建"一祖三宗"说,把陈与义列为"三宗"之一,一方面确立了他在宋诗史上的地位,另一方面却引起明清以来关于他和江西诗派关系的长期讨论,简斋诗因被贬抑而一落千丈,直至近代宋诗派打破"一祖三宗"说门户之见的思维惯性,才再得价值之回归。本文通过梳理历代诗论对陈与义诗的评析,联系江西诗派"一祖三宗"说确立的过程,探讨简斋诗被列为"三宗"之一的原因,并揭示其历史定位与江西诗派在中国诗学史中地位升降的离合关系,以期对简斋诗的诗学接受史得出客观明晰的认识。The achievement of Chen Yuyi, a distinguished poet in the turn of the Southern and Northern Song Dynas-ties, had already been widely recognized in the Southern Song Dynasty. His poetry writing was regarded as ‘a New Style' or ‘Chen Jianzhai Style'. According to the notion of ‘one ancestor and three predecessors' noted by Fang Hui in the Yuan Dynasty, Chen Yuyi was regarded as one of the three predecessors. It did not only at-tach importance to his place in the history of song poetry, but also generated long-term debates about his rela-tionship with the Jiangxi poetry school during the Ming and Qing dynasties. Chen Yuyi 's poems were denounced until the ‘one ancestor and three predecessors' notion was challenged. The value of his work began to be received due to the recognition after the sectarian bias was deconstructed by the modern ‘ song poetry school'. This essay endeavors to sort out different interpretations of Chen Yuyi 's poetry through the dynasties, exploring the causes that Chen was regarded as one of the three predecessors in the light of the notion estab-lished by Jiangxi poetry school. By uncovering the subtle link between Chen Yuyi 's work and the ups and downs of Jiangxi poetry school in the history, this essay proposes an objective elucidation of the reception histo-ry of Chen Yuyi's poetry.

关 键 词：新体 陈简斋体 一祖三宗 二陈 接受史 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]