《典论·论文》文体学思想甄微  

Identify on Cao Pi's Stylistics Thought of “Talking About Classic and Talking About Literature”

作　　者：任竞泽[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学文学院,陕西西安710119

出　　处：《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第1期92-99,共8页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(11BZW021);教育部人文社会科学基金项目(10YJA751059);陕西师范大学人文社科基金重点项目(10szd03)

摘　　要：曹丕的文体学思想中,最具争议的是"文本同而末异"这一命题,尤其是何为"本同"众说纷纭。"本同"指各种文体都源出五经,这反映了曹丕的思想是以儒家为主的。从归纳并类着眼,"四科八体"的"四科"就是"四分法",它对真德秀的"四目"法产生了影响,而其源头则要溯至孔门四科、类书分类以及目录学"四部"等。Style of the source is the same, however, end is different. It is a controversial problem in CaoPi＇ s stylistics thought. Opinions vary about What is the ＂same source＂. Through the comprehensive analysis of many people＇ s point of view, I think all kinds of style comes from the five classics. This illustrates the Cao Pi with Confucianism. Cao Pi broke the Confucian thought, this idea is questionable. About the ＂four subjects and eight kinds of style＂, it is believed that the classification of the ＂eight kinds of style＂ is a literary style. This article focuses on the induction. It is pointed out that ＂four subjects＂ is the ＂four classification＂. Its impact on Zhen Dexiu. It is the source of Confucius of the four subjects, and the classification of books as well as the bibliography ＂ four parts＂, etc.

关 键 词：曹丕 本同末异 文源五经 儒家思想 四科八体 目录学 

分 类 号：H052[语言文字—语言学]