检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第1期64-74,共11页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:重庆市社会科学规划资助项目(2011YBGL113)
摘 要:文章主要从发展路径、组织结构、治理结构、政企关系出发将英美、日韩企业集团成长模式作了比较分析,表明英美模式为市场主导型,日本模式为产融结合型,韩国模式为政府主导型,三种模式各有利弊。中国企业集团的成长独具中国特色,并在政府的指导下发展迅速,但与发达国家相比仍差距较大。因此,随着市场化程度的提高和国际竞争的加剧,中国企业集团应借鉴国外企业集团的经验和教训,完善自身发展,提高国际竞争力。This paper makes a comparative analysis about enterprise group' s growth pattern mainly from devel- opment path, organizational structure, governance structure, and government- enterprise relations among Britain, United States, Japan, South Korea and China. It is showed that the British -American model is market-oriented, the Japanese model is a combination of industrial capital and financial capital, and the Korean model is the govern- ment' s leading. Three models all have their own advantages and disadvantages. With unique Chinese characteris- tics, the enterprise group of China is developing rapidly under the guidance of the government, but it differs greatly from the enterprise groups in developed countries. Therefore, with the improvement of marketization in China and the fierce international competition, Chinese enterprise groups should draw lessons from foreign enterprise groups, improve their own development and enhance international competitiveness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222