检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]邯郸市第一医院消化科,河北邯郸056000 [2]石家庄市第一医院干部一科,河北石家庄050011
出 处:《临床肺科杂志》2014年第3期414-416,共3页Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨多项联合治疗对胃食道返流继发哮喘的临床疗效。方法随机选择我院胃食道返流继发哮喘患者50例,随机分为:对照组26例,给予常规与奥美拉唑治疗;观察组24例,给予多项联合治疗。比较两组疗效、哮喘症状评分及消失时间等的差异。结果观察组治疗有效率为95.38%,显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组哮喘症状评分与常见症状消失时间均显著低于对照组(均P<0.05);观察组患者的肺功能及血细胞因子指标改善明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论多项联合治疗胃食道返流继发哮喘症状控制更好,药物具有安全性高。Objective To discuss the clinical effect of combination therapy for asthma caused by gastroe sophageal reflux (GER). Methods 180 asthma patients caused by GERD were selected and divided into two groups. The observation group (n = 90) was given combination therapy, and the control group (n = 96 ) was given conventional therapy of antiinflammatory and omeprazole. Asthma symptom scores, time of symptoms disappeared and effective rate were compared. Results After the treatment, the effective rate of the observation group was 95.38% , which was significantly higher than that in the control group (P 〈 0. 05 ). The scores of asthma symptom and the time of common symptoms disappeared time were significantly lower in the observation group than in the con trol group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The improvement of lung function and blood cell factor index was more pronounced in the ob servation group than in the control group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The combination therapy for asthma patients caused by GER is better with high safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46