检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北师范大学法学院 [2]兰州大学西北少数民族研究中心,甘肃兰州730000
出 处:《西藏大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第6期38-43,共6页Journal of Tibet University
基 金:2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"甘青川藏族部落社会纠纷解决机制研究"阶段性成果;项目号12XJC850004
摘 要:调解是藏区处理民间纠纷的传统主导方式,其模式、方法在藏族社会转型的新形势下暴露出了整体性与针对性缺失等问题,调解的高调与低效的反差现象已较为明显,尤其是对于新型民间纠纷的处理。美国哲学家肯·威尔伯的整合理论为上述问题的解决提供了有价值的视角。文章借鉴整合理论中的"象限"与"层次(阶段)"概念分析探讨了藏族新型民间纠纷的调解方法(策略)。At present, mediation is the most universal mechanism used in dealing with the new style disputes in Tibetan society. However, as Tibetan society is going through transition under new trend of development, this mechanism is facing problems due to lack of holistic and targeted approaches. Highprofile and low efficiency in mediation has become quite obvious, especially in dealing with the new types of disputes among the people. The Integral Theory proposed by the American philosopher Ken ing the stated problems. This article takes quadrants and Levels, ry and analyzes the mediation strategies that can be applied in m an people. Willber provides valuable perspectives on solv the two important concepts from Wilber' s theo ediating the new types of disputes among Tibet
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.83.34