机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院放射科,北京100020 [2]天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院放射科,天津300060
出 处:《放射学实践》2014年第2期136-139,共4页Radiologic Practice
基 金:北京市博士后基金资助(2011ZZ-08)
摘 要:目的:对宫颈癌组织、正常宫颈、放疗后宫颈癌组织的扩散加权成像(DWI)表现及表观扩散系数(ADC)值进行分析。探讨DWI在宫颈癌诊断以及放疗后疗效监测中的价值。方法:对177例宫颈癌患者、105例正常宫颈对照组和117例放疗后宫颈癌患者进行横断面/矢状面DWI扫描(b取0和500s/ram。),观察正常宫颈、宫颈癌及放疗后宫颈癌的DwI表现,并测量相应的ADC值,比较正常宫颈腺体和纤维间质的ADC值,宫颈癌与正常宫颈的ADC值,宫颈癌放疗后恢复正常或炎症反应、放疗后肿瘤残存分别与初诊宫颈癌及正常宫颈的ADC值,放疗后肿瘤复发与初诊宫颈癌及放疗后恢复正常或炎症反应的ADC值差异。结果:105例正常宫颈于DWI上呈高-低-稍高信号,宫颈腺体和纤维间质的ADC值差异具有统计学意义(P=0.025)。177例宫颈癌于DWI上呈高信号,其ADc值(1.08±0.36)×10-3mm2/s)低于正常宫颈(P=0.001)。b=500s/mm2时,诊断宫颈癌和正常宫颈的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.806,95%可信区间为0.626~0.985。117例放疗后宫颈癌中,54例宫颈恢复正常或呈炎性反应,其ADC值较初诊宫颈癌高(P=0.000),与正常宫颈无明显统计学差异(P=0.056);46例宫颈癌组织残存,其ADC值与初诊宫颈癌无明显统计学差异(P=0.190),但低于正常宫颈(P=0.000),17例放疗后宫颈癌复发,其ADC值与初诊宫颈癌无明显统计学差异(P=0.060),但与放疗后恢复正常或呈炎性反应患者相比具有统计学差异(P=0.002)。结论:DWI能够区分宫颈癌组织和正常宫颈.可用于宫颈癌诊断及预后监测。Objective: To analyze the diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) features and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of cervical cancer,post radiotherapy lesion and normal cervix,thereafter to assess the values of DWI in diag- nosis of cervical cancer and monitor of efficacy of radiotherapy. Methods: Axial or sagittal diffusion weighted scan (b-- 500s/mm2) of cervix was performed in 177 patients with cervical cancer, 105 healthy women as control and 117 patients with post-radiotherapy cervical cancer. DWI findings were observed and corresponding ADC value were measured in cervical cancer, post-radiotherapy cervical cancer and normal cervix. The ADC values were recorded and compared through statistical analysis between cervical cancer and control group; between post radiotherapy repair or inflammatory reaction, post-radio- therapy residual or recurrence and untreated lesion and control group respectively. Results:Normal cervix showed hyper-, hypo- and moderate hyper-signal intensity on DWI and the ADC values were significantly different between normal cervical glands and interstitial substance (P=0. 025). All cervical cancers appeared as high signal-intensity and the ADC value was significantly lower than that of normal cervix (P=0.01). The area of ROC was 0. 806 and 95% confidence interval was 0. 626-0. 985. The ADC values recovered to normal or presented as inflammatory reaction after radiotherapy in 54 cases, which was significantly higher than that of untreated cervical cancer (P: 0. 000), and had no significant difference from that of normal cervix (P=0. 056). The ADC value of post-radiotherapy residual in 46 cases was of no significant difference from that of untreated cancer (P: 0. 190), but was significantly lower than that of normal cervix (P= 0. 000). The ADC value of tumor recurrence in 17 cases was significantly different from normal or post-radiotherapy inflammation (P=0. 002), but no difference was found compared with untreated cancer. Conclusion: DW
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...