生命政治安全设制中例外的正常化  

The normalisation of exception in the biopolitical security dispositif

作　　者：冈萨洛.韦拉斯科.阿里亚斯 王爱松 

机构地区：[1]马德里自治大学哲学系 [2]卡米洛.何塞.塞拉大学

出　　处：《国际社会科学杂志（中文版）》2013年第3期39-52,6+8,共14页International Social Science Journal（Chinese Edition）

摘　　要：本文的目的是根据安全与无法预料的未来之间的新的悖谬关系分析我们当代对政治的理解。作者既考察例外状态的机制———法律体系通过非法措施以保护法律本身———也考察政府对突发事件的生命政治学治理。使政治秩序免于不确定性的这两种方式之间的连接点,是豁免这个哲学概念。作者认为,尽管用非法措施保护法律这种明显自相矛盾的必要性是政治的一个结构性特征,但对灾难性事件的担忧却使它变成了规范。结果,未来有目共睹:未来不再是一种政治紧张状态,而是恰好相反,是政治必须首先回避的东西。通过这种分析,作者试图展示法律问题在"9·11"事件之后的危机时代的理论复兴、国际关系的生命政治学研究途径与豁免这个哲学概念之间的关联,这种关联在社会科学中受到了忽视。The aim of this article is to analyse our contemporary understanding of the political in terms of the new and paradoxical relationship between security and the unforeseen future. I will consider both the mechanism of the state of exception, whereby the legal system protects itself by unlawful measures, as well as the biopolitical government of contingency. The connection between these two ways of protecting the political order from uncertainty will be the philosophical concept of immunity. I will argue that even though the apparently selfcontradictory necessity of unlawful measures to protect the law is a structural feature of the political, the fear of catastrophic events turns it into the norm. As a consequence, the future is seen: the future is no longer a political tense, but on the contrary what politics must avoid above all. Through this analysis, I attempt to show the link between the theoretical revival of the problem of law in times of crisis after 9/11, the biopolitical approach to international relations,and the philosophical concept of immunity,which is neglected in the social sciences.

关 键 词：政治安全 正常化 设制 生命 世界秩序 2001年 新恐怖主义 恐怖袭击 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论] D0-05[政治法律—法学]