检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省高要市人民医院普通外科,广东高要526040
出 处:《中国当代医药》2014年第6期49-51,共3页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨双直线切割缝合器在肠吻合术中的临床优势。方法选取2008年1月~2010年1月在本院进行一期手术及行腹腔镜下右侧结直肠癌根治术的右侧结肠癌患者73例,40例应用双直线切割吻合器者作为观察组,33例应用圆形切割吻合器者作为对照组,比较两组的手术时间、吻合时间、术中出血量、肠道功能恢复时间及术后并发症等。结果观察组的手术时间、吻合时间、术后肠功能恢复时间短于对照组,术中出血量、术后2 d排便次数、手术费用少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论双直线型切割缝合器在肠吻合术中更具临床优势。Objective To study the clinical advantage of bilinear stapler for the right colon cancer radical resection. Methods 73 cases of patients who were made entero-anastomosis from January 2008 to January 2010 in our hospital were selected for researching,40 cases of patients used bilinear stapler were as the observation group,33 cases of patients used cycle stapler were as the control group.The operation time,the time of anastomosis,intraoperative hemorrhage,the recovery time of bowel function and complications after surgery was compared between the two groups.Results The operation time,the time of anastomosis,the recovery time of bowel function was shorter than that of control group,intraoperative hemorrhage,defecation after two days operation,operation cost was less than that in the control group(P0.05). Complications after surgery of two groups had no significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion The bilinear stapler for the right colon cancer radical resection has the better clinical advantage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.21