检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]富阳市人民医院肿瘤科,浙江富阳311400 [2]浙江省肿瘤医院,浙江杭州310022
出 处:《中国现代医学杂志》2013年第36期71-73,共3页China Journal of Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的预防食管癌手术的胸内食管胃吻合口瘘,为食管癌手术治疗提供有效吻合方法。方法将712例食管癌患者随机分为吻合器组387例和对照组325例。吻合器组采用吻合器进行机械吻合;对照组采用常规手工丝线缝合吻合。观察两组的手术情况和术后并发症情况,并进行统计学分析。结果两组均成功手术切除食管恶性肿瘤。吻合器组平均手术时间(153.7±49.0)min;对照组平均手术时间(189.5±56.1)min。吻合器组的手术时间显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。吻合器组术的首次吻合成功率97.16%。两组术后均未出现死亡病例。对照组术后并发症发生率14.46%(47/325);吻合器组术后并发症发生率9.56%(37/387)。吻合器组的术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。对照组术后吻合口瘘发生率2.46%;吻合器组术后吻合口瘘发生率0.78%。吻合器组的吻合口瘘发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论采用吻合器机械吻合术治疗食管癌操作简便,可缩短手术时间,减少术后吻合口瘘的发生率。[ Objectives] To prevent intrathoracic esophagus-stomach anastomotic leakage in esophageal cancer surgery; to find an effective anastomosis method for esophageal cancer surgery. [Methods] 712 patients with esophageal cancer were randomly divided into mechanical anastomosis group of 387 cases and control group of 325 patients. Mechanical anastomosis group was treated with mechanical anastomosis; control group was treated with manual anastomosis. The surgical situations and postoperative complications were observed and compared. [ Results ] Esophageal malignancy of both groups were successfully reseeted. The mean operative time of mechanical anastomosis group was (153.7±49.0)min; the mean operative time of control group was(189.5±56.1)min. The operation time of mechanical anastomosis group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P 〈0.05). The first time anastomat success rate of mechanical anastomosis group was 97.16%. No postoperative deaths occulted in both groups. Incidence of postoperative complication of control group was 14.46% (47/325); incidence of postoperative complication of mechanical anastomosis group was 9.56% (37/387). Incidence of postoperative complication of mechanical anastomosis group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P 〈0.05). The anastomotic leakage rate of control group was 2.46%; anastomotic leakage rate of mechanical anastomosis group was 0.78%. The anastomotic leakage rate of mechanical anastomosis group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P 〈 0.05). [ Conclusions ] In the treatment of esophageal cancer, the mechanical anastomosis is simple and can shorten the operation time, reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.219.125