文学与城市的双向构建——评《文学中的城市》  

Bilateral Construction of Literature and City: Comment on The City in Literature

作　　者：黄继刚[1] 苗胜利[2] 

机构地区：[1]阜阳师范学院文学院,安徽阜阳236041 [2]新疆财经大学中国语言学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830026

出　　处：《华北水利水电学院学报（社会科学版）》2013年第6期127-129,共3页Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金第54批一等资助项目(2013M540589);教育部人文社科青年基金项目(12YJCZH075);阜阳师范学院青年基金项目(2011FSSK03)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：理查德·利罕在《文学中的城市》中提出的研究范式有别于传统的城市文学研究,后者侧重的是反映论,而前者侧重的是再现论,其既关注城市的发展变迁对文学文类、叙事和修辞等方面的影响,也关注文学对城市的想象性构建。这一视角更适合于去阐释城市和文学的复杂性关联,对目前的城市文学研究有诸多的启发性意义。In The City in Literature Richard Lehan proposed a research paradigm, which is different from the traditional one. The traditional research paradigm focuses on Reflection, while Reproduction is highlighted by Richard Lehan. His research paradigm is not only concerned with the influence which the development and change of cities has on the literary genre, narration and rhetoric, but also the imaginative reproduction of the cities in the literature. From this perspective it is more suitable to explain the complicated relationship between the city and literature and it has great instructive significance on the current research of the city literature.

关 键 词：理查德·利罕 《文学中的城市》 构建 

分 类 号：I022[文学—文学理论]