检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡杰[1]
出 处:《西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第2期68-73,共6页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:证据开示制度是刑事司法中实现控辩双方平等对抗的重要保障。英美等国家的证据开示制度已相当完善,但我国对刑事证据开示制度的研究尚显滞后。近年来,要求在我国确立刑事证据开示制度的呼声变得越来越强烈,对此,许多省份在司法实践中都进行了相应探索和实践,为证据开示制度的建立奠定了基础。我国现有的良好立法基础、实践中积累的丰富经验、对国外成果的借鉴,可以确保我们能够建立具有中国特色的社会主义刑事证据开示制度。探析刑事证据开示制度在我国实行的可行性问题,不仅符合刑事司法改革的趋势和要求,而且有利于建立平等的诉讼对抗模式,平衡控辩双方的诉讼地位。Evidence discovery is an important way to achieve equality for prosecutors and defendants in criminal jus-tice. Some countries such as the UK and the US have established a fully developed evidence discovery system,but studies on criminal evidence discovery system in China lags behind them. In recent years,appeals for establishing criminal evidence discovery system in China have become increasingly urgent. Many provinces have made explora-tion in practice,wihch has laid a foundation for the establishment of the system. China is to establish socialist crimi-nal evidence discovery with Chinese characteristics as it has a good legislation foundation and rich experiences in practice ,and it can learn from foreign evidence discovery systems. Feasibility studies of criminal evidence discovery system in China not only meets requirements of criminal justice reform,but also is conducive to the realization of e-quality of confrontation between the prosecutor and the defendant in criminal justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.79.94