論胡瑗等宋初教育家的學術及文章  

Comments on Hu Yuan and Early Song Educators' Academic Practice and Articles

作　　者：張興武 

机构地区：[1]杭州師範大學中國古代文學與文獻研究中心

出　　处：《中华文史论丛》2014年第1期235-265,共31页Journal of Chinese Literature and History

基　　金：教育部人文社會科學基金項目<宋代士人學術研究與詩文創作的關聯與互動>(批准號:13YJA751064)之階段成果

摘　　要：宋仁宗時代,胡瑗、孫復、石介及李覯等人欲超越"漢唐之學",重釋儒經"義理",體現出"知古明道"的學術自覺。"四公"先以草澤身份築室授業,後又執教太學,始終將"經義"解析與"時務"、"治道"相聯繫,爲"宋學"啓蒙導夫先路。他們反對"聲律浮華之詞",審美取向與歐陽修等文學之士頗爲不同。其作品多"根柢經術",醇質務實;不足之處在於好"張大其説",議論"粗疏",甚者還有迂闊"矯激"之弊。要之,胡、孫、石、李以儒學名家而獻身教育,在學術探索、教育實踐及"古文"創作等各方面均有建樹,其利弊得失值得深究。During the Song Renzong period,Hu Yuan,Sun Fu,Shi Jie,Li Gou and other scholars desired to surpass the"Scholarship of Han andTang Dynasties",reinterpreted the"Philosophical Connotations",and reflected the academic consciousness of "History Study and Taoism Development". These four misters engaged in education as plebeian at first,and then coached the Imperial College; they always connected the "Confucian-classics " analysis with the "Current Affairs " and "Taoism Management",so as to enlighten the"Song Studies". They opposed the "word with vanity and rhythm",holding a quite different aesthetic orientation from Ouyang Xiu and other literary scholars. Their works largely grounded the classics, which showed the "Ethosomes pragmatic " style; but with the tendency of "exaggeration ", these " inattentive " discussions also had disadvantages of "pedantic"inclinations with Specificity. In short,as Confucian masters,Hu,Sun,Shi,Lee devoted to education,and contributed a lot in the fields of academic exploration,educational practices,and "classical " creative. Their legacies are worthy of study.

关 键 词：宋初三先生 李觏 学术 教育 文章 

分 类 号：G529[文化科学—教育学] K244[文化科学—教育技术学]