认罪态度对法官判决影响的实证分析  

Empirical Analysis of Influence on Judge's Verdict from Attitude to Plead Guilty

作　　者：胡铭[1] 冯姣[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,杭州310008

出　　处：《江苏行政学院学报》2014年第2期125-131,共7页The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金;浙江省钱江人才计划;三江青年学者计划资助项目的阶段性成果

摘　　要：被告人的认罪态度会对法官的判决产生影响,这不仅因为认罪态度是酌定量刑情节,而且与法官的个人因素也有着密切的关联。认罪态度对法官判决影响的方式主要是通过一种感性的刺激,比如通过影响法官的情绪从而对法官的判决产生影响。由于我国实行的是义务本位主义的诉讼模式,再加上定罪与量刑一体化的制度设置,关于被告人认罪态度的法律规定实质上会对被告人的权利产生负面影响。为限制法官在认罪态度认定方面的自由裁量权,保障被告人的诉讼权利,应建立独立或相对独立的量刑程序,进行量刑辩护,把构成认罪态度的各个要素进行量化。The defendant＇s attitude to plead guilty may influence the judge＇s verdict, not only because the attitude to plead guilty is condition for discretionary sentencing, but also because it is connected to the judge＇s personal factors. Such influence is mainly operating with emotional stimulus, such as emotional impact on the judge that influences his/her decision. Since China adopts the obligation-based litigation mode, plus the integrated institution for conviction and sentencing, the legal provisions governing the defendant＇s attitude to plead guilty may cause negative impact on the defendant＇s rights. To restrict the judge＇s authority in discretionary sentencing based on the attitude to plead guilty, and to protect the rights of the defendant, it is necessary to establish independent or relatively independent sentencing procedures, to allow sentencing defense, and to define quantitative factors for the attitude to plead guilty.

关 键 词：认罪态度 量刑程序 司法裁判 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]