检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《教育与经济》2014年第1期17-21,共5页Education & Economy
基 金:国家社会科学基金教育学重点课题"城镇化进程中的教育变迁研究"(课题批准号:AHA090003);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"义务教育学校布局问题研究"(项目编号:09JZD0035)
摘 要:利用11个省(自治区)的县级教育行政部门调研数据,本文探讨了县级教育行政部门在学校布局调整政策执行中的相关议题。研究发现:学校布局调整政策执行过程中存在"认识"和"行动"的巨大差距,政策执行方式行政化色彩浓厚、执行阻力较大,政策执行存在较大扭曲,未来仍有四成左右县(市)希望进一步撤并学校。笔者认为,提升县级教育行政部门在县域教育规划中的决策地位,理顺各级政府对义务教育财政分担比例,建立多方参与的政策问责机制,能为学校布局调整政策有效执行构筑必要的制度保障。Based on the data of 11 provinces' survey, this paper discusses the policy implementation of school layout adjustment from the perspective of educational administration at county level. The Research shows that: there was a huge gap between "understanding" and "action " in the process of the policy implementation; overusing administrative manners caused large resistance in implementing policy at county level; and there existed the policy distortion in the implementation. But data still shows 40% of counties expect to close schools in the future. Considering this situation, there have three measures to guarantee the policy implementation. Firstly, the decision status of educational administrative department should be promoted in educational program at county level. Secondly, the financial contribution proportion of compulsory education should be rationalization at all levels of government. At last, establishing the accountability mechanism with multi-participation is also needed.
分 类 号:F08[经济管理—政治经济学] G40-054[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46