故意在大陆法系犯罪构成论体系中的地位  

The Status of Intention in the Theory of Crime Constitution in Civil Law System

作　　者：张亚平[1] 郑永川[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院,河南开封475001

出　　处：《天津法学》2014年第1期25-30,共6页Tianjin Legal Science

摘　　要：在大陆法系犯罪构成论中,麦耶的三阶层(又称三要件)犯罪构成论体系影响最为深远,是一个较为科学和完善的理论体系。故以麦耶体系为框架,探讨故意的地位,实则是探讨故意在构成要件符合性、违法性和有责性要件中的地位。然而,故意的地位随时代的发展而变化,学者们的观点也莫衷一是,所以有必要对这个问题进行梳理。以三要件之间的特殊关系为视角,可以得出故意不仅属于责任要素,也属于构成要件要素和主观违法性要素的结论。但是,故意在三要件中的内涵存有差异。In criminal constitution theory of the continental legal system, Mayer＆#39;s three-level system of crime constitution theory has a great influence which is quite a reasonable and thorough theory system. So in the framework of Mayer＆#39;s system, talking about the status of intention is actually talking about the status of inten-tion in the conformity of constitutive elements, illegality and liability. However, the status of intention is metabolic with the development of the times, and different scholars＆#39; viewpoints are different. So it is necessary to sort out this problem. Due to the special relationship of three constitutive elements, intention is not only the element of constitutive elements, but also the element of illegality and liability. But the connotations in the three-level are different.

关 键 词：故意 犯罪构成论 构成要件 违法性责任 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]