西方文论的接受方式——以文艺学研究生的读书与学位论文为例  

On the Modes of Acceptance of Western Literary Theory——With the Reading and Theses of Graduates of Literature and Art as Examples

作　　者：王坤[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学中文系,广州510275

出　　处：《北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第1期55-63,共9页Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金规划项目"当代文论与‘去黑格尔化’研究"(13BZW004);广东省社科规划一般项目"文论创新与经典重译"(GD12CZW10);广东省普通高校人文社科一般项目"西方思维批判与文艺学基础理论的更新及回归"(11WYXM003)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：文艺学专业研究生接受西方文论有两种方式:查资料与读书。前者针对专业知识储备不足,类似于进口先进产品;后者着意理论思维能力提升,相当于掌握核心技术。"读书"的内涵与通常的意义有别,包蕴着三大特定所指。一,读经典原著而不是查资料:对于知识点乃至具体观点的重视,要置于对理论体系和思维过程具体展开的整体掌握之下,明确本体意识在理论思维能力中的核心地位;二,读书之后要能够"报数":所读之书说了什么,为什么要如此说,这是理论思维能力的基本体现;三,报数之后还要能够"盘存":有哪些问题以何种方式说过了,接着说的空间和方向如何,具备这种程度的理论思维能力,就可以自己判断学位论文选题的价值。凡是能够这样读书的研究生,学位论文的写作无不顺利,质量不无可观;反之则周折重重,质量定是差强人意。The graduates of literature and art accept the western literary theory in two ways ： searching literature and reading. The former aims at professional knowledge, similar to the importation of advanced products; the latter lays stress on theoretical thinking ability, meaning to grasp the core technology. “Reading” contains three specific meanings and its connotation is different with the usual sense. First, read classic books rather than searching information with the consciousness in the theoretical thinking ability as the core ; second, after reading books to be able to “ report number ”,making clear what the books say and why they say so, this is the basic embodiment of theoretical thinking ability; third, based on these knowledge, the students can make a judgment of their own theses. If the students read books so, their thesis writing must be smooth, and the quality of the theses must be remarkable ; otherwise it will be opposite.

关 键 词：读书与查资料 读书与“报数” 读书与“盘存” 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]