论“不能作为定案根据”的证据  

Evidence “Inadmissible To Be the Basis for Deciding a Case”

作　　者：李忠勇[1,2] 高洁如[3] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学 [2]北京市第一中级人民法院 [3]北京政法职业学院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2014年第1期66-70,共5页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：刑事诉讼司法解释规定的不能作为定案根据的证据类型除了非法证据、瑕疵证据外,还有狭义上"不能作为定案根据"的证据。狭义上"不能作为定案根据"的证据大体上可以分为7类。通过对这类证据进行类型化梳理和特质揭示,可以帮助法官准确理解适用司法解释的规定,提升法官审查判断证据的能力,确保案件审理和认证的质效。Besides illegal evidence and defective evidence that are inadmissible to be the basis for deciding a case, as is prescribed in judicial interpretations on criminal prosecution, there is evidence ＂inadmissible to be the basis for deciding a case＂ in a narrow sense. This type of evidence can be put into seven categories on the whole. Making clear and revealing the characteristics of this type of evidence can help judges accurately understand and apply provisions of the judicial interpretations, improve their ability to examine and judge evidence, and ensure quality and efficiency in recognizing evidence and hearing any case.

关 键 词：证据 不能作为定案根据 类型 处理原则 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]