检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京100101 [2]杭州师范大学认知与脑疾病研究中心,杭州310000 [3]浙江省认知障碍评估技术研究重点实验室,杭州310000
出 处:《心理科学》2014年第2期357-362,共6页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31271109;81301175);中科院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KSCX2-EW-J-8)的资助
摘 要:以汉字、一般线条图、似字线条图和笔画组合为材料,采用字典判断任务考察3-6岁儿童汉字字形认知的发展特点。结果发现儿童辨别汉字与似字符号的能力随年龄增长显著提高。3岁儿童较难区分汉字与各类似字符号。4-5岁儿童对汉字笔画特征有了一定意识。6岁儿童对汉字组合模式的认识显著提高。笔画意识出现较早且发展速度较快,组合模式意识出现较晚且发展速度较慢。5岁和6岁是汉字字形认知发展的重要时期。The present study aimed to examine the early development of visual word form recognition in Chinese children aged 3 to 6. The four types of stimuli were employed: Chinese characters, stroke combinations, character-like line drawings and line drawings. Each stimulus type consisted of 8 items. Chinese characters were simple or left-right structure with low and high frequency. Stroke combinations were constructed by randomly recombining the strokes of a Chinese character. Character-like line drawings were formed by transforming the strokes of a Chinese character into vertical and horizontal straight lines. Line drawings were constructed by recombining the lines of a character-like line drawing randomly. Participants were instructed to decide whether an item was a real Chinese character or not. To exclude potential confounding of subjective judgments, we analyzed the discriminative ability (d’) according to signal detection theory. Results showed that the main effect of age was significant (F(4,149)=61.99, p〈.001, η2=.63). Results of the post-hoc test showed that children’s discriminative ability was increased with age (p〈.01). For hit rate, the main effect of age was not significant (F(4,149)=2.25, p〉.05, η2=.06), whereas for false alarm rate the main effect of age was significant (F(4,149)=85.42, p〈.001, η2=.70). Results showed that the false alarm rate was increased with age (p〈.001), suggesting that children’s ability to reject the non-character stimuli was enhanced with age. Further, we analyzed the accuracy of judging the three types of non-character stimuli. Results showed that for 3-year-olds, there was no difference between any two types of non-character stimuli (ps〉.05). For 4- and 5- year-olds, the accuracy of judging the two types of line drawings was higher than that of the stroke combinations (ps〈.001). In addition, the accuracy of judging the two types of line drawings in 5-year-olds was higher than that in 4-year-olds (ps〈.001)
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222