出 处:《中华医学杂志》2014年第8期572-575,共4页National Medical Journal of China
摘 要:目的 观察含呋喃唑酮的三联和四联方案对幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori)感染根除治疗的效果及不良反应.方法 2010年6至12月,以南昌大学附属第一医院因上胃肠道症状而接受胃镜检查确诊为H.pylori感染阳性的十二指肠溃疡患者为研究对象,将符合入选标准的357例初治患者[男200例、女157例,年龄(42±12)岁]按计算机随机数字表随机分成4组:三联7 d组89例,给予阿莫西林1 000 mg+呋喃唑酮100 mg+雷贝拉唑10 mg,2次/d,疗程7 d;三联10 d组91例,与三联7 d组相同方案,疗程10 d;四联7 d组88例,给予阿莫西林1 000 mg,呋喃唑酮100 mg,雷贝拉唑10 mg,枸橼酸铋钾220 mg,2次/d,疗程7 d;四联10 d组89例,方案与四联7 d组相同,疗程10 d.各组疗程结束4周后,复查14C-尿素呼气试验,结果阴性者判断为H.pylori根除成功.结果 323例患者按方案完成了治疗(其中三联7 d和10 d组各有7例未完成,四联7 d和10 d组分别有9和11例未完成).按意向性分析(ITT分析),三联7 d、三联10 d、四联7 d、四联10 d组的根除率分别为71.91%(64/89)、81.32%(74/91)、78.41%(69/88)、83.15%(74/89),总体差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05).按符合方案分析(PP分析),各组的根除率分别为78.05%(64/82)、88.10%(74/84)、87.34%(69/79)、94.87%(74/78),总体差异有统计学意义(P=0.017);四联10 d组的根除率明显高于三联7 d组(P=0.002),其他各组两两相比,差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05).总的不良反应发生率为7.00%(25/357),各组之间比较不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05).结论 含呋喃唑酮四联10 d疗法较三联7 d疗法具有更高的根除率;10 d疗程与7 d疗程的根除率相似;含呋喃唑酮三联或者四联,疗程7 d还是10 d不良反应发生率相似.Objective To explore the eradication efficacies of triple versus quadruple furazolidone- based regimens for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Methods A total of 357 outpatients with H. pylori infection were enrolled from June to December 2010. There were 200 males and 157 females with an average age of (42 _+ 12 ) years. A diagnosis of duodenal ulcer was made according to their endoscopic examination results. They were randomly assigned into 4 treatment groups ~ 7-day triple ( n = 89 ) and 10-day triple (n =91 ) , rabeprazole 10 rag, amoxicillin 1 000 mg and furazolidone 100 mg twice daily for 7 and 10 days respectively. 7-day quadruple ( n = 88 ) and 10-day quadruple ( n = 89 ) , rabeprazole 10 rag, bismuth 220 rag, amoxicillin 1 000 mg and furazolidone 100 mg twice daily for 7 and 10 days respectively. H. pylori status was re-assessed with 14 C-urea breath test after 4-week therapy. Results Among them, 323 cases completed the study. According to the analysis of intention-to-treat (ITT) , the 1t. pylpori eradication rates were 71.91% (64/89) in 7-day triple, 81.32% (74/91) in 10-day triple, 78.41% (69/88) in 7-day quadruple and 83.15% (74/89) in 10-day quadruple groups. No significant deviation existed among all groups (P 〉 0. 05 ). According the per-protocol (PP) analysis, 1t. pylori eradication rates were 78.05% (64/82)in 7-day triple, 88.10% (74/84) in 10-day triple, 87.34% (69/79) in 7-day quadruple and 94. 87% (74/78) in 10-day quadruple groups. Significant deviation existed among all groups (P = 0. 017 ). The H. pylori eradication rate in 10-day quadruple group was significantly higher than that in 7-day triple group (P = 0. 002 ). The total adverse reaction rate was 7. 00% (25/357). No significant difference existed among all groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusions Quadruple treatments provide higher H. pylori eradication rates than triple therapies. A 10-day treatment may improve H. pylori eradication rate. And 1
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...