检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第2期97-103,共7页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:在当代中国社会的法治建设进程中,法治悖论困扰着关于法治的理论认识与现实运行。本文运用马克思早期著作《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中表述的悖论观,展开对法治悖论的哲学反思。首先将法治悖论划分为形式逻辑层面的法治悖论与认识论层面的法治悖论,进一步分析法治悖论产生的逻辑学原因与认识论原因,以及法治悖论的逻辑学原因与认识论原因之间的内在联系,特别指出法治悖论在认识论上的启示意义,最后提出对待当代中国法治悖论的应有态度与解决之道,即应当从人的自由本质之价值元点设定出发,坚持形式法治与实质法治的辩证统一,通过法治的社会实践活动不断化解法治悖论,促进社会的发展进步与人的自由全面发展。In the process of building the rule of law in law has been plaguing the theoretical understanding and contemporary China, the paradox of the rule of practical operation. Employing the concept of Paradox expressed by Marx in his Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, this paper reflects on the paradox of the rule of law. First, the paradox of the rule of law is divided into formal logic level and epistemological level; furthermore, the reason of the paradox was discussed, including the inner link between logic and epistemology reasons. Attitude toward paradox under the rule of law in contemporary China should be presented with the solution. Starting from the value set of human free nature, we should adhere to the dialectical unification of formal legal system and essential legal system, and promote people's free all-round development through dissolving paradox of rule of law by the practice of rule of law constantly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145