对南海九段线争议解决途径的再思考——兼论《联合国海洋法公约》的局限性  

Rethinking the Ways to Solve the Dispute about Nine-dashed Line——Together with Thinking of the Limitation of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

作　　者：张磊[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042 [2]复旦大学,上海200042

出　　处：《太平洋学报》2013年第12期50-62,共13页Pacific Journal

基　　金：上海市教委科研创新项目"对海外公司的外交保护与中国对策研究"(13YS084);华东政法大学科学研究项目"后殖民时代民族自决权的流变与当代民族矛盾的内在联系研究"(12HZK009)的阶段性成果;上海市教委重点学科建设项目(J51103);上海市高校青年教师培养资助计划(hdzf10003)的资助;中国太平洋学会2010年重大项目"东;南中国海诸岛中有争议岛屿的史地考证及相关问题研究"(2200214)的研究成果

摘　　要："九段线"是我国在南海区域主张各项权益的主要依据之一。然而,2013年3月,国际海洋法法庭强行组建仲裁庭,审议菲律宾单方面提交的仲裁申请。该申请要求确认九段线违反1982年的《联合国海洋法公约》。国内也有学者认为,应当通过法律途径解决争议。然而,从九段线的法律性质和《联合国海洋法公约》的局限性来看,法律途径实际上暂时不符合中国的国家利益。因此,政治途径更加适合解决包括九段线在内的南海争议。对此,我国可以从排除法律途径、调整大国关系、巩固实际控制以及分化周边国家立场等方面开展工作。Nine-dashed Line is the main basis for China to claim the interests and rights of the South China Sea. However, in March of 2013, International Tribunal for the Low of Sea forcibly set up arbitration court to judge the application put forward by the Philippines. This application includes the idea that nine-dashed line disobeys United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982. In China, there are also many scholars who think that it is proper to solve the dispute by legal ways. But considering the legal nature of nine-dashed line and the limitation of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, legal ways are not in the interest of China currently. Hence, political ways are more suitable to solve the disputes of South China Sea including the disputes about nine-dash Line. China could make efforts in some aspects such as eliminating the legal ways, adjusting the relationship between great powers, reinforcing the actual control and differencing the standpoints of surrounding countries.

关 键 词：南海九段线 争端解决 菲律宾 仲裁申请 

分 类 号：D998.8[政治法律—国际法学]