检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:包斯琴[1]
机构地区:[1]内蒙古师范大学法政学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010022
出 处:《内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第1期92-94,共3页Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:先进的诉讼法制国家普遍将民事程序选择权确立为当事人的一项基本程序权利。关于民事程序选择权,在我国的民事诉讼法以及相关司法解释中虽有规定,但不太系统,且职权主义色彩太浓,导致司法实践中当事人的民事程序选择权大多流于形式。笔者在对两大法系主要国家关于民事程序选择权的立法规定加以介绍,试图通过了解当前世界法治较发达国家的立法规定,立足国情,借鉴国外立法,以期在完善立法方面有所帮助。In countries where there is an advanced procedural law ,usually the right to chose a civil procedure is the primary procedural right of the party .There are also rules in our country's Civil Procedure Act and its relevant legislative explanations ,but they are neither systematic enough nor free of the feature of power .As a consequence ,it is usually a matter of form for the party to carry out his right of choosing their civil procedures .In this essay ,relevant legislative rules about this right in the major two law systems are introduces .The writer attempts to be helpful in perfecting legislation by learning from foreign legisla -tion with our country's reality as the staring point .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117