检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南大学心理学部,重庆400715
出 处:《保健医学研究与实践》2014年第2期25-27,共3页Health Medicine Research and Practice
摘 要:目的探讨人际自立与积极情绪状态和消极情绪状态的关系。方法采用青少年学生人际自立量表(ISSS-AS)和积极情绪消极情绪量表(PANAS)对180名在校大学生进行调查。结果相关分析表明,人际独立(r=0.27)、人际主动(r=0.32)、人际灵活(r=0.30)、人际开放(r=0.20)与积极情绪状态呈正相关(P<0.05);人际责任(r=-0.18)、人际开放(r=-0.17)与消极情绪状态呈负相关(P<0.05)。逐步回归结果显示,人际主动、人际灵活显著预测积极情绪状态(P<0.01);人际责任显著负向预测消极情绪状态(P<0.05)。结论人际自立可通过增强积极情绪、降低消极情绪维护情绪健康。Objective Discussing the relationship between the interpersonal independence and the positive mood state and negative mood state. Method Conducting a survey of 180 students with ISSS-AS and PANAS. Re- suits Related analysis showed that interpersonal independence (r=0.27), interpersonal initiative (r=0.32), interpersonal flexibility (r = 0.30), and interpersonal openness (r = 0.20) all had a relation of direct proportion to positive mood state (P〈0.05), while interpersonal responsibility (r =- 0.18) and interpersonal openness (r=--0.17) both had a relation of inverse proportion to negative mood state (P〈0.05). Feedbacks obtained gradually showed that interpersonal initiative and interpersonal flexibility markedly predicted positive mood state (P〈0.01), while interpersonal responsibility markedly and inversely predicted negative mood state (P〈0.05). Conclusion Interpersonal independence is able to preserve emotional health through increasing positive mood and reducing negative mood.
分 类 号:B842.6[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147