检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]新疆警察学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830011 [2]新疆大学文科基地中亚研究所,新疆乌鲁木齐830046 [3]中国人民公安大学,北京100038
出 处:《新疆大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年第5期47-52,共6页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:在公诉案件的庭审过程中,被害人在公诉案件中的权益如何保护是一个现实的问题。从被害人在刑事诉讼中的地位发展史看,其地位经历了一个从顶端到低潮然后回升的状态。在当今社会中,对被害人的保护不仅应从实体上规定项的权利,还应从程序上加以保护,尤其是应当以一种公众看得见的方式进行。而最直接的,即应在公诉案件的庭审过程中赋予被害人与被告人相同的庭审地位,以真正确保其诉讼权利的实现。In the trial of a case of public prosecution, the victim has been no independent appearance. In one hand, it is because the prosecution has strong enough to let the victim in the lawsuit process can only act as supporting actor, the other hand is to protect the rights of the accused, so, how to protect the rights and interests of the victim in a case of public prosecution is a real problem. From the history of development of victim' s status of trial in criminal lawsuit, it is easy to see the status of the victim has experienced a tip to the low tide and then rebounded from the state. In today's society, to protect the victim should provide various rights not only in the entity, but also in the aspect of procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229