圣徒与叛徒的二律背反——论安德列耶夫小说《加略人犹大》中的神学叙事  

The Antinomy of Being a Saint and a Traitor: On Andreev's Theological Narration in Judas Iscariot

作　　者：郑永旺[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学俄语学院

出　　处：《外语与外语教学》2014年第2期86-90,共5页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基　　金：2010年国家社科基金"俄罗斯反乌托邦文学研究"(项目编号:10BWW013);中俄人文合作协同创新中心重大攻关项目"当代俄罗斯文艺形势与未来发展"(项目编号:2012ZD004);黑龙江大学博士科研启动资金资助项目"解体后俄罗斯文学中的知识分子形象研究"(项目编号:201212)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：安德列耶夫的中篇小说《加略人犹大》触及了基督教中一个敏感的问题,即耶稣之死这样深重的灾难由犹大来承担是否公平。在作家的笔下,犹大就是为了背叛耶稣而成为其门徒的。他的行为所导致的耶稣之死是基督教世界的重大事件,然而这其中隐藏着作者颠覆性的道德判断,他想借对犹大背叛意义的审视来彰显耶稣的崇高,进而确定犹大在整个基督教世界中看似卑微实则伟大的地位,因为没有犹大的背叛就没有耶稣的受难与死亡,也就没有耶稣后来的复活,而如果没有耶稣的复活,那么基督教作为一种信仰则缺少一个令人信服的环节。换言之,犹大的行动是信仰得以成立的前提。本论文的主要观点是,该作品意在推翻福音书中已有的关于犹大的定论,让犹大以圣者的形象和基督并列在基督教的荣耀榜上。Andreev＇s medium-length novel Judas Iscariot touches on a sensitive issue of Christianity. That is：is it fair or not for Judas to undertake responsibility for Jesus＇ death, a disastrous event in the history of the religion. Taking the writer＇s line of thought, Judas becomes Jesus＇ follower just to betray Him. Jesus＇ death then turns to a big event in Christian religion world. But there is a grand moral judgment that Andreev would like to show Christ＇s sublime and in this way confirms Judas＇ humble and great position. In fact, without Judas＇ betrayal Jesus could not go to his death peacefully and would not create a miracle of resurrection. People could hardly believe in Christianity without Jesus＇ resurrection details. In other words,Christi- anity cannot stand for lack of Judas＇ betrayal as evidence. The main point of view in this paper is that the novel re- verses an existing conclusion in Gospels and tries to place Judas as a Saint with Jesus on the list of Christianity＇s glory.

关 键 词：安德列耶夫 《加略人犹大》 耶稣 

分 类 号：I06[文学—文学理论]