习惯如何成为习惯法及其方法论意蕴——两种认可说的比较分析  

How the Custom to be a Customary Law &Its Methodological Meaning——A Comparative Analysis of Two Kinds of Recognition Theory

作　　者：李可[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,南京211189

出　　处：《甘肃理论学刊》2014年第1期32-45,共14页Gansu Theory Research

基　　金：2013年度江苏省法学会法学研究课题"转型语境下司法方法论中的‘二维叙事’现象研究"(SFH2013D01)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：习惯如何成为习惯法的问题必须从界定"习惯"、"习惯法"这对概念入手,而不同的定义将在很大程度上决定人们对该问题的态度或立场。社会认可说与国家认可说是人们在回答上述问题上的两种立场或学说,它们背后各自隐藏着一幅研究者据以解释经验事实的理想图景。其中国家认可说与文化研究中的"大传统"模式、制度研究中的"现代化"范式相互支持,极大地阻碍了习惯法研究。上述讨论启示我们,在习惯法研究中必须确立正确的方法论立场,才能比较客观地还原习惯法的本质和拓展习惯法研究的深度。The problem of how the custom to be a customary law must be from the definition of the two con-cepts of ＂habit＂ and ＂customary law＂. The different definitions will largely determine people＇s attitude or position toward the issue. Social recognition theory and state recognition theory are two kinds of positions or theories to answer that above question, they each has hidden behind an ideal picture which explain the experience facts encountered upon the researchers. State recognition theory mutually supports with the ＂great tradition＂ mode in cultural studies and the ＂modernization＂ paradigm in system studies, greatly hin-der the study of customary law. The above discussions enlighten us that we must establish the correct po-sition of methodology to objectively restore the essence of customary law and expand the depth of the cus-tom law research.

关 键 词：习惯 习惯法 社会认可说 国家认可说 方法论 

分 类 号：DF0-052[政治法律—法学理论]