《诗毛氏传疏》训诂“刻意求新”析论  

Analysis on“the Artificial Innovation”of Commentaries on Mao's Exegesis of Book of Songs

作　　者：崔金涛[1] 李丽群[2] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004 [2]广西师范大学漓江学院,广西桂林541006

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第1期88-93,共6页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：广西师范大学2013年度校级科研项目(师政科技[2013]0019号)

摘　　要：《诗毛氏传疏》是陈奂最重要的《诗经》研究著作,其全面发明古文毛诗的历史贡献至今为训诂学界所称道。但如果站在当今训诂学的立场上来审视,其丰富的训诂实践仍然存在诸多不足,"刻意求新"即是其中之一。"刻意求新"的不足表明,对注释书训诂的基本特点、重要原则等重要问题,陈奂都缺乏完整、深入的认识,而这些问题又与乾嘉学派对注释书训诂的总体认识水平密切相关,基本上可以看作是乾嘉学派共有的问题。从这种意义上说,剖析《传疏》"刻意求新"的不足,对于我们全面、准确地把握乾嘉学派的训诂学成就具有重大意义。Commentaries on Mao＇s Exegesis of Book of Songs is the most significant work on the study of Book of Songs by Chen Huan, and its historic contribution to expounding Book of Songs comprehensively has been commended by modern Chinese exegetics circle. But from the perspective of modern Chinese exegetics, the book still has many shortages, and the artificial innovation is one of them. This deficiency shows that Chen Huan lacked complete and deep understanding of the important issues, such as fundamental features and important principles of annotation. These problems are intimately associated with the level of general knowledge of Qian-Jia school for annotation books. This basically can be regarded as a common problem of Qian-Jia school. In this sense, the analysis of the inadequacy of the book is of great significance for us to grasp the exegetical achievements of Qian-Jia school comprehensively and accurately.

关 键 词：诗毛氏传疏 “刻意求新” 注释书 乾嘉学派 陈奂 

分 类 号：H13[语言文字—汉语]