城市研发型人力资本配置效率研究——基于专利存续期的视角  

Research on Allocative Efficiency of R&D Type of Human Capital in Cities from the Perspective of Patent Duration

作　　者：王崇锋[1] 石龙[1] 张古鹏[2] 

机构地区：[1]青岛大学国际商学院,山东青岛266071 [2]中国科学院管理学院,北京100190

出　　处：《中国海洋大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第2期56-59,共4页Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)

基　　金：2012年青岛市软科学项目(1213846ZHC)

摘　　要：近年来,人力资本配置效率越来越受到理论界的关注,人力资本对于区域经济的贡献水平可以由多种指标衡量,并从中凸显了其配置效率问题。本文从创新质量视角出发,重点考察了人力资本对于区域创新质量的影响,从而考察该地区人力资本的配置效率。文章通过选取专利存续期作为创新质量的评价指标,探讨了我国东、中西部典型城市人力资本配置效率的差异。通过使用专利生存曲线及固定效应模型研究发现,东部城市间的创新质量差距较大,中西部城市之间的创新质量差距较小,东部城市的创新质量平均水平显著高于中西部城市;东部城市人力资本投入带来的创新质量的提升要高于中西部城市,中西部城市每增加单位科技经费投入所带来的创新质量的提升要高于东部城市,而这很可能是由东、中西部城市产学研水平差异所决定的。In recent years ,as an important standard measuring human capital allocative efficiency ,in-novation quality has drawn more and more attention from theoretical circles .Taking patent duration as evaluative index of innovation quality ,this paper aims to discuss the human capital allocative efficiency differences of typical eastern and mid-western cities .Through patent survival curve and fixed effects mod-el ,it is found that innovation quality gap between eastern cities is larger than that of mid-western cities , and average level of innovation quality in eastern cities is significantly higher than that of mid-western .In-novation quality promotion brought about by human capital investment in eastern cities is higher than that in mid-western cities ,while the contribution brought about by each additional unit of science and technolo-gy funding of the former is lower than that of latter .All these may be caused by the different level of in-dustry-university-institute cooperation in typical eastern and mid-western cities .

关 键 词：人力资本 创新质量 专利 存续期 产学研合作 

分 类 号：F270[经济管理—企业管理]