检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周杰琦[1]
机构地区:[1]广东财经大学经济贸易学院,广东广州510320
出 处:《广东财经大学学报》2014年第2期12-20,共9页Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71173052);国家社会科学基金一般项目(13BJY182);广东财经大学校级科研项目(14GJPY79002)
摘 要:选取1995年~2011年中国的省际面板数据,采用经济增长理论中的收敛分析方法和基于回归方程的因素分解法进行检验,结果表明:全国、中部和西部地区的碳强度不存在绝对β收敛,但存在条件β收敛,东部、东北地区的碳强度存在俱乐部收敛;人均收入、技术水平、能源消费结构、城市化水平、贸易开放、重工业比重、产权结构等因素的区域差异对中国碳强度的省际差异形成均起到一定作用,其中人均收入对碳强度省际差异的解释度最高,其次是技术水平与能源消费结构,再次是贸易开放和城市化水平,最后是重工业重和产权结构。Based on China's provincial panel data during 1995 -2011, and using the convergence analy- sis method based on the theory of economic growth and the decomposition method based on regression equa- tions, this paper makes an empirical study on the carbon intensity's convergence and influencing factors. It shows that: the carbon intensity of the whole nation, the central and western regions does not show an abso- lute β convergence, but a conditional β convergence. The club convergence of carbon intensity exists in the eastern and northeast areas. The regional difference of the per capita income, the level of technology, energy consumption structure, urbanization level, trade openness, the proportion of heavy industry, and the struc- ture of property rights play a role on the provincial difference of China's carbon intensity. Per capita income has the most important influence on the inter-provincial difference of carbon emission intensity, followed by technology level and energy consumption structure, open trade and urbanization level, but the proportion of heavy industry and the structure of property rights are low.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3