促卵泡激素体内生物活性测定及其各国药典方法比较  被引量:12

Comparison of the methods for in vivo FSH bioassay in pharmacopoeia of various countries

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李湛军[1] 李心欣[1] 梁成罡[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国食品药品检定研究院,北京100050

出  处:《药物分析杂志》2014年第4期727-732,共6页Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis

基  金:十二五重大新药创制--创新药物研究开发技术平台建设(No.2012ZX09304010)

摘  要:目的:基于长期大量实验数据,对各国药典促卵泡激素(FSH)生物活性测定方法进行梳理、比较。方法:对中国药典2010年版(ChP2010)FSH生物测定法优化,测定国内外多批重组人促卵泡激素(rhFSH)、尿源FSH及复方rhFSH—rhLH产品的体内生物活性,并就动物数、大鼠体重、溶媒中HCG含量、给药剂量、反应值等与EP7.0和USP35-NF30的FSH的生物测定方法进行对比,梳理其异同。结果:ChP2010每组8只动物与EP7.0和USP35-NF30每组5只动物,计算效价结果总平均偏差率为2.3%,总平均可信限率由21.2%升至28.7%,都在生物测定误差允许范围内。ChP2010规定雌大鼠出生19~23d,体重36。50g,体重偏小,实验灵敏度差,体重36~40g的大鼠卵巢增重明显小于40—50g的空白组卵巢增重(P〈0.05);溶媒中HCG含量也偏低;给药剂量与EP7.0和USP35-NF30相近;卵巢重作为反应值与EP7.0和USP35-NF30器官系数作为反应值不同,两者测定结果间差异无显著性意义。结论:每组5只大鼠即可满足实验要求,减少实验动物用量(3R原则)。大鼠出生21—23d,体重应为40—60g(最大相差10g内),溶媒中HCG含量适当增加至25~30Iu·mL^-1为最佳FSH生物测定实验条件,优化ChP2010的FSH生物测定法。Objective: To sort out and compare the follicle - stimulating hormone (FSH) bioassay methods in different national pharmacopoeia based on a large number of long - term experimental data. Methods: Various batches of prod- ucts of rhFSH, u - FSH, u - FSH - HP and Co rhFSH - rhLH at home and abroad were evaluated by in vivo FSH bioassay method optimized in Chinese pharmacopeia 2010 (ChP 2010)and were compared with the method in Ep 7. 0 and the USP 35 -NF 30 for FSH in aspects of the number of animals, rat body weight, HCG levels in solvent, FSH dose ranges,response values,etc. Results: The average deviation rate was 2. 3% between each group of eight animals in ChP 2010 and each group of five animals in EP 7.0 and the USP 35 -NF 30;the average confidence limit rate was from 21.2% to 28.7% ,all in the allowed error range of bioassay. In ChP,female rats being 19 -23 d old with body weights ranging 36 - 50 g had poorer experimental sensitivity and their weights were lower. The ovarian weight gain in 36 -40 g rats was significantly smaller than that in 40 -50 g rats in blank group(p 〈0. 05). HCG levels were also lower in solvents ; FSH dose ranges were similar to EP 7.0 and USP 35 - NF 30. In contrast to EP 7. 0 and USP 35 - NF 30 in which the organ coefficient was taken as the response value, the weight of the ovaries was used as the re- sponse value in ChP 2010,but there was no difference between those measurement results significantly. Conclusion: A total of five rats in each group can meet the bioassay requirement of reduction ( the 3R principle). It is the best method for FSH bioassay that the rat body weight should be 40 -60 g (the difference between the heaviest and the lightest rat is not more than 10 g)on 21 -23 days after birth;HCG levels in solvents should be increased to 25 -30 IU · mL^-1. ChP 2010 for FSH bioassay should be optimized.

关 键 词:重组人促卵泡激素(rhFSH) 促卵泡激素(FSH) 尿促性素 体内生物测定 生物活性 大鼠卵巢增重 中国药典2010年版(ChP 2010) 优化方法 

分 类 号:R917[医药卫生—药物分析学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象