Vector牙周治疗仪治疗慢性牙周炎的疗效及主观评价  

Clinical effects and subjective pain of Vector^(TM)-system on chronic periodontitis

作　　者：解用江[1] 赵悦[2] 宁佳[1] 阎雷[1] 叶满军[1] 

机构地区：[1]大庆油田总医院口腔内科,黑龙江大庆163001 [2]大庆油田总医院心脏内科

出　　处：《中国美容医学》2014年第6期487-489,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine

摘　　要：目的:比较Vector超声治疗仪与传统超声治疗仪治疗慢性牙周炎的疗效及患者对疼痛的主观感受。方法:选取30例慢性牙周炎患者,在每例患者的上、下颌各选一单颌使用Vector牙周治疗仪(实验组),另一单颌使用常规超声牙周治疗仪(对照组)作为对照。治疗前和治疗后3个月检查PD和BI。患者治疗结束后VAS记分进行疼痛评价。结果:实验组和对照组PD和BI术前和3个月后比较均有明显下降,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。而实验组和对照组二组间比较无明显差别,不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验组和对照组VAS值分别为10.80±2.75和39.23±2.46,两组比较具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:Vector超声治疗仪治疗慢性牙周炎和传统超声治疗仪有相同的疗效,但是患者疼痛明显减轻。Objective The purpose of the present study is to compare the clinical effects and subjective pain of VectorTM-system on chronic periodontitis.Methods Selected 30 cases of periodontitis patients.On each patient,select a single jaw using VectorTM-system （experimental group）,another single jaw using conventional ultrasonic instrument （control group） as a control.Examining bleeding index and probing depth before the first visit treatment,initiated therapy after three months.Evaluating VAS score after treatment.Results Both PD and BI were significantly decreased before and after treatment in two groups,there was statistical significance （P〈0.05）.But there was not statistical significance between two groups （P〉0.05）.Experimental group and control group VAS values were respectvely 10.80±2.75 and 39.23±2.46,there was statistical significance （P〈 0.05）.Conclusion Getting the same effect on treating chronic periodontitis between VectorTMsystem and traditional ultrasound therapy device,but there is less pain in VectorTM-system

关 键 词：Vector超声治疗仪 慢性牙周炎 评价 

分 类 号：R783[医药卫生—口腔医学]