检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙延东[1] 吴国豪[1] 张波[1] 蒋奕[1] 韩寓嵩[1] 何国栋[1] 庄秋林[1] 秦新裕[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属中山医院普通外科上海市临床营养研究中心,上海200032
出 处:《中华胃肠外科杂志》2014年第4期369-372,共4页Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
摘 要:目的对比腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的临床疗效,探讨腹腔镜治疗直肠癌的安全性及短期疗效。方法回顾性分析2011年4月至2012年6月复旦大学附属中山医院治疗直肠癌患者的临床资料,其中腹腔镜手术96例(腹腔镜组),开腹手术216例(开腹组),对两组患者的临床结果进行分析对比。结果腹腔镜组与开腹组全直肠系膜切除总体完成率分别为86.5%(83/96)和89.4%(193/216)(P〉0.05),总体保肛率分别为78.1%(75/96)和75.0%(162/216)(P〉0.05)。肿瘤近切缘距离分别为(10.3±4.1)cm和(10.0±4.3)cm(P〉0.05),肿瘤远切缘距离分别为(3.4±0.9)cm和(3.6±1.4)cm(P〉0.05),淋巴结清扫数目分别为(12.8±5.2)枚/例和(13.7±6.4)枚/例(P〉0.05)。腹腔镜组与开腹组相比,术中出血量减少[(98.0±28.7)ml比(175.0±41.0)ml,P〈0.05]、术后排气时间缩短[(2.7±0.9)d比(3.4±0.9)d,P〈0.05]、术后进食半流质时间缩短[(3.7±1.2)d比(4.4±1.5)d,P〈0.05]、术后住院天数减少[(9.4±4.9)d比(11.6±6.2)d,P〈0.05]以及术后并发症发生率降低[15.6%(15/96)比25.9%(56/216),P〈0.05],但手术时间延长[(155.7±48.4)min比(120.0±26.7)min,P〈0.05]。均无手术死亡病例。术后随访6—24月,两组均无死亡病例,局部复发率分别为2.1%(2/96)和2.3%(5/216)(P〉0.05)。结论腹腔镜治疗直肠癌能获得与传统开腹直肠癌根治术相同的肿瘤根治效果。Objective To evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer by comparing the efficacy of laparoscopy and open surgery. Methods Clinical data of patients with rectal cancer treated by laparoscopy or open surgery in Zhongshan Hospital from April 2011 to June 2012 were analyzed retrospectively, and the clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared. Results Ninety-six rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery (LS) were enrolled. A total of 216 rectal cancer patients underwent open surgery (OS). There was no operative death in both groups. In LS and OS group, the overall completion rates of TME were 86.4%(83/96) vs. 89.3%(193/216)(P〉0.05) respectively, and the overall anal reservation rates were 78.1% (75/96) vs. 75.0% (162/216)(P〉0.05) respectively. The mean distance to proximal resection margin and distal resection margin respectively were (10.3±4.1) cm vs.(10.0±4.3) cm (P〉0.05) and (3.4±0.9) cm vs. (3.6±1.4) cm (P〉0.05) respectively. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes respectively were (12.8±5.2) vs. (13.7±6.4)(P〉0.05). Compared to OS, LS presented less blood loss [(98.0±28.7) ml vs. (175.0±41.0) ml, P〈0.05], shorter postoperative hospital stay [(9.4±4.9) d vs. (11.6±6.2) d, P〈0.05], quicker postoperative recovery of bowel function[ (2.7±0.9) d vs. (3.4~0.9) d, P〈O.05], shorter postoperative time to intake semi-solid[(3.7±1.2) d vs. (4.4±1.5) d, P〈0.05], less postoperative complications (15.6% vs. 25.9%, P〈0.05), but longer operative time [ (155.7±48.4) min vs. (120.0±26.7) min, P〈0.05 ]. Postoperative follow-up was 6 to 24 months, and the local recurrence of LS and OS was 2.1% and 2.3%(P〉0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery can obtain the same radical efficacy for rectal cancer as compared to open surgery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28