由一则案例论事后抢劫之司法认定  

On the Judicial Recognition of Post-event Robbery

作　　者：尚闯[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2014年第2期39-42,共4页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：事后抢劫罪的前提条件是值得评价为"盗窃罪、诈骗罪或者抢夺罪"的行为;对"携带凶器盗窃"中"凶器"的认定宜采"客观危险﹢主观用途"的标准;为窝藏赃物、抗拒抓捕或者毁灭罪证而使用暴力或者以暴力相威胁的对象应限定为被告人观念上特定之人。The premises of post-event robbery are behaviors involving “theft, fraud or forcible seizure”. In term of theft with lethal weapon, the weapon should comply with the standard of “objective danger and subjective purpose”. The object of adopting violence or threat with violence for the purpose of concealing booties, resisting arrest or destruction of evidence should be restricted to a particular person of defendant properties.

关 键 词：事后抢劫 凶器 对象 罪数 

分 类 号：DF625[政治法律—刑法学]