金融资本与生产资料所有制形式的复杂化——列宁帝国主义论的学术意义  

Complication of Financial Capital and Ownership of Production Means——Academic Significance of Lenin's Theory of Imperialism

作　　者：唐正东[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学哲学系,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《南京政治学院学报》2014年第1期1-6,共6页Journal of PLA Nanjing Institute of Politics

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"当代资本主义的理论与实践研究"(09JZD0002)

摘　　要：与马克思关于股份公司的论述不同,列宁认为帝国主义条件下的股份公司越来越抛弃了联合起来的个人资本的外衣,变成了加强金融寡头实力的一种手段。生产资料所有权与经营权的分离也达到了极大的程度,这是与金融资本的统治直接相关的。这在根本上说明了帝国主义只是一种过渡的资本主义。列宁关于金融资本的深刻论述映射出了历史唯物主义方法论的学术力量。Different from Marx＇s discussion of stock companies, Lenin believed that stock companies under the condi- tions of imperialism came to abandon the cloak of united individual capital and became a means of enhancing the strength of the financial oligarchy. The separation of ownership of the means of production and management right reached a great extent, which was directly related to the rule of financial capital. This suggests that imperialism is on- ly a transition to capitalism. Lenin＇s profound discussion of financial capital mirrors the academic strength of histori- cal materialistic methodology.

关 键 词：金融资本 生产资料所有制 列宁 帝国主义论 

分 类 号：A82[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]