检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜方义
机构地区:[1]江山市中医院,浙江324100
出 处:《中国实用眼科杂志》2014年第4期459-461,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
摘 要:目的研究间歇性外斜视患者的调节功能与隐斜性近视漂移的关系。方法临床病例对照研究。对2007年7月至2012年7月在江山市中医院眼科就诊的年龄在21~38岁的成人间歇性外斜视组患者56例;正常对照组40例,用MEM(Monocular Estimate Method)动态检影的方法测量注视40cm处调节视标时主导眼的调节反应、正/负相对调节(Positive Relative Accommodation,PRA/Negativerelative Accommodation,NRA)及与之相对应的隐斜性近视。用SPSSl2.0统计软件包进行统计学分析两组间关系。结果间歇性外斜视组患者64.29%(36/56)主导眼表现为调节超前,平均调节反应为(一0.22±0.77)D,与之相对应的隐斜性近视漂移为(一1.22±0.27)D;正常对照组调节反应为(+O.38±0.38)D,近视漂移为(一0.42±0.27)D,间歇性外斜视组主导眼的调节反应与对照组间差异有统计学意义(t=5.89,P=0.00,P〈0.05);调节反应量与斜视度之间差异有统计学意义(r=一0.71,P=0.00,P〈0.05)。间歇性外斜视组PRA平均为(一3.93±0.79)D,对照组为(一3.11±0.69)D,两组间差异有统计学意义(t=5.95,P=0.00,P〈0.05);间歇性外斜视组NRA平均为(+1.91~0.58)D,对照组为(+2.28±0.31)D,间歇性外斜视组隐斜性近视漂移为(一1.22±0.27)D,对照组近视漂移为(一0.42±0.27)D,两组间差异有统计学意义(t=一2.81,P=0.01,P〈0.05)。结论间歇性外斜视患者在注视近距离视标时表现为调节超前,调节功能与隐斜性近视漂移密切相关。Objective To study the relationship between the accommodative function and phoria myopia in patients with intermittent exotropia. Methods A total of 756 patients at age 20 to 38 years old with intermittent exotropia and 50 normal controls were recruited. Accommodative response in dominant eye was examined using MEM (Monocular Estimate Method) dynamic retinoscopy, Posi- tive Relative Accommodation/Negative Relative Accommodation (PRA /NRA) to 40cm target with bin- ocular viewing, deviation. The data were analyzed using SPSS12.0 system. Results 64.29% domi- nant eyes showed an accommodative lead. The mean accommodative response was in patients and normal control dominant eye was (-0.22±0.77)D and (+0.38±0.38)D. The phoria myopia was (-1.22± 0.27)D and (-0.42±0.27)D. There was significant difference between dominant eye in patients and in normal controls (t =5.89, P =0.00) in accommodative response and (t =-2.81, P =0.01) in phoria my- opia. Accommodative response in dominant eye was significantly correlated with the angle of exotro- pia (r =-0.71, P =0.00). The mean PRA was (+1.91±0.58)D in patients and (-3.11±0.69)D in normal controls (t =5.95, P =0.00). The mean NRA was (+1.91±0.58)D in patients and (+2.28±0.31)D in nor- mal controls (t =-2.82, P 〈0.01). Conclusions Accommodative response in patients with intermittent exotropia is lead. The accommodative response is related with the phoria myopia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171