检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南科技大学体育学科部,四川绵阳621010 [2]西南科技大学经济管理学院,四川绵阳621010
出 处:《体育科技》2014年第1期117-118,共2页Sport Science and Technology
摘 要:评价指标的权重分配是体育教师评价体系构建中的关键环节,科学的指标权重确定方法对于评价体系的客观性至关重要。本文采用文献资料和逻辑归纳等方法,对近十年3268篇体育教师评价研究中15个类别的评价体系指标权重确定方法进行了分析与概括,总结了各种方法的优缺点,为今后研究提供参考。How to determine the indicator weight is essential to the evaluation system of PE teachers. It is crucial to determine the indicator weight reasonably and scientifically of a PE teachers evaluation system. This paper analyses the research on PE teachers' evaluation system in recent ten years by using the methods of literature analysis, induction and synthesis. The PE teachers' evaluation systems encountered in 3268 different literatures can be categorized into 15 types depending upon the nature of the indicators, weights and the inference mechanism being in their design. The approaches in different types for determining the indicators weights receive special focus and the approaches and their advantage, disadvantages are analyzed and summarized, which would be helpful for the future research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3