检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北省荆州市中心医院输液室,434020 [2]湖北省荆州市中心医院急诊科,434020 [3]湖北省荆州市中心医院肿廇科,434020
出 处:《护理管理杂志》2014年第4期247-248,共2页Journal of Nursing Administration
摘 要:目的调查护士对双硫醒反应新进展的认知现状,以针对性培训提高其防治能力。方法采用问卷调查法,对212名临床一线护士进行双硫醒反应新进展知识问卷调查。结果37.26%的护士没有听说过双硫醒反应;5.19%的护士认为双硫醒反应不会危及生命;24.53%的护士在做头孢菌素皮试前不会询问患者饮酒史;54.72%的护士认为应用致双硫醒反应药物后,不饮酒就不会发生双硫醒反应。护士双硫醒反应新进展知识问卷得分为0~25(11.164±5.90)分;外科护士双硫醒反应新进展知识得分低于其他科室护士,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论护士对双硫醒反应知识认知不足,应加强护士掌握双硫醒反应新进展培训,提高诊治能力和做好防范,杜绝双硫醒反应的发生。Objective To investigate nurses′ knowledge of new progress about disulfiram reactions, so as to target training to improve the ability among nur- ses. Method Totally,212 clinical nurses were investigated about the new progress of disulfiram reactions by questionnaires. Results The results showed that 37.26% of the nurses didn't hear of disulfiram reactions at all ,5.19% believed disulfiram reaction was not threatening,24.53% didn1 inquired about alcohol history before cephalosporin skin test, and 54.72% thought that there would be no disulfiram reaction if the patient did not take alcohol. The score of knowledge about the new process of disulfiram reactions was 0~25 ( 11. 16±5.90 ). Score of surgery nurses was lower than that of other departments ( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Nurses'knowledge about the new progress of disulfiram reaction is insufficient. Targeted training of new progress of disulfiram reaction for nurses should be strengthened to improve nurses'ability to detect and reduce the occurrence of disulfiram reaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.42.179