《周易》复卦卦辞“七日来复”新诠  被引量:2

A New Interpretation of “Returning after Seven Days” in Hexagram Fu[■]

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:舒大刚[1] 钟雅琼[2] 

机构地区:[1]四川大学国际儒学研究院,四川成都610064 [2]四川大学历史文化学院,四川成都610064

出  处:《周易研究》2014年第2期32-40,共9页Studies of Zhouyi

基  金:国家社科基金重大委托项目:"<巴蜀全书>"(10@ZH005);四川省社科基金规划项目:"<中国儒学文献通史>"(SC12E001)

摘  要:考察历代易家关于复卦"七日来复"的各种解释,可以发现诸家之说虽然各皆有理,但是都未能切合上古社会的历史实际。本文通过探讨上古"十日并出"、"以火纪时"以及汉儒"十二辟卦"等说法,认为"七日来复"实际蕴含着一段人类认识自然、模拟自然的历史记忆,其中依稀保留着中国古代历法史上久被遗忘的"十日历"("十月历")的事实,所谓"七日"者正是"七月"的古称,与临卦"八月有凶"正好前后呼应。Through scrutinizing the variety of interpretations of the "returning after seven days" in the judgment of hexagram Fu [ , Returning, 24 ] by periods, it can be seen that though each interpretation has its own reason, all of them cannot accord with the real remote ancient history of China. Based on ancient sayings of "ten suns ' simultaneous emerging", " marking time by the position of the Antares", and the "twelve sovereign hexagrams" mentioned by Han [ 206 BCE-220 CE) Confucians, this paper holds that "returning after seven days" actually conceives a part of historical record of human ' s knowing and simulating nature, which seems to have re- tained the "ten-month" calendar in ancient China by which the "seven days" just refers to "seven months" and the "inauspiciousness in the eighth month" mentioned in hexagram Lin [ , Approaching, 19] is just an echo to it.

关 键 词:七日来复 八月有凶 复卦 临卦 火历 

分 类 号:B221[哲学宗教—中国哲学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象