检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郝恩河[1] 谷传华[1] 张菲菲[1] 袁凯歌[1] 王亚丽[1]
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室,青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉中国430079
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2014年第3期449-451,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的考察社交退缩和社交效能感对网络关系成瘾的影响。方法采用大学生社交退缩量表、社交效能感问卷和网络关系成瘾问卷测量646名大学生。结果①大学生的社交退缩显著正向预测网络关系成瘾(t=2.01,P<0.05),而社交效能感显著负向预测网络关系成瘾(t=-2.19,P<0.05);②大学生的社交效能感在社交退缩与网络关系成瘾之间、社交退缩在社交效能感与网络关系成瘾之间均起部分中介作用。结论社交退缩和社交效能感会以两种不同方式影响网络成瘾。Objective To investigate the effect of social withdrawal and social self-efficacy on Internet relationship dependence. Methods Social Withdrawal Scale for College Students,Social Self-efficacy Questionnaire,and Cyer Relational Addiction Questionnaire were administered to 646 sampled college students. Results (!)College students'social withdrawal could predict positively Internet rela- tionship dependence( t = 2.01, P 〈 0.05 ) ,while social self-efficacy could predict negatively Intemet relationship dependence( t =-2.19, P 〈 0.05 ) ;(~College students'social self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship between social withdrawal and Internet relationship dependence, and their social withdrawal partially mediated the relationship between social self-efficacy and Interact relationship depend- ence. Conclusion Social withdrawal and social self-efficacy can affect Interact relationship dependence in two different ways.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学] B849[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171