检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘晶[1]
出 处:《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第2期282-286,共5页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:2012年国家社会科学基金青年项目(12CFX044)
摘 要:为保证庭审过程集中高效地进行,保障诉讼参与人的诉讼权利,今年新刑事诉讼法设立了庭前会议制度。但是,由于公权力在立法博弈中占据优势地位以及审判资源的不足等,导致庭前会议应当具有的人权保障价值并没有实现,诸如无法避免庭前预断、证据展示不对等、非法证据不排除等。未来我国的刑事庭前会议的具体建构应当从庭前法官的设置、控辩双方的程序选择、控辩合意的效力以及庭前程序的规范化等方面入手,实现新法尊重和保障人权的立法目的。To ensure trial to proceed centrally and efficiently and protect participants" rights in the crim- inal proceedings,the new criminal procedure law has set up a system of criminal pretrial conference. However,owing to the public power's absolute dominant position in this legislation game and insuffi- cient trial resources, value of human rights protection contained in the pretrial conference is not real- ized,such as prognosis before court,unequal evidence disclosure between the parties and unexclusion of illegal evidence etc.The construction of criminal pretrial conference should start from setting pretri- al judge, endowing the two parties procedure options and right of reaching an agreement, and standard- izing the procedure before court, so that we can realize the legislative purpose to respect and protect human rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143