检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京口腔医院牙周科,北京100050
出 处:《中国医刊》2014年第4期55-57,共3页Chinese Journal of Medicine
摘 要:目的对传统口腔卫生宣教与电教式口腔卫生宣教的临床效率进行比较,观察电教式口腔卫生宣教的优点。方法拍摄口腔卫生宣教录像片,内容包括正确刷牙,牙线和间隙刷的使用。在候诊室循环播放4个月。对两种口腔卫生宣教的用时和效果进行统计分析。结果电教式口腔卫生宣教平均节省口腔临床护士16.98分钟/天,全科12名护士共节省194.1分钟/天,两种方式的口腔宣教效率差异有显著性。结论《口腔卫生宣教》教学片的拍摄适合临床使用,可大大提高助疗的效率,同时在口腔护士教学领域也具有广泛的用途。Objective To make clinical comparison the way of Oral Hygiene Instruction( OHI) between showed on model and by the multimedia. Method The video of OHI which included correct brush tooth,usage of dental floss and inter toothbrush was made and played in waiting hall. The difference between time and efficiency of OHI showed on model and played and played in waiting hall were analyzed statistically. Result For the OHI way of video show-ing,16. 98 min/day was saved an assistant,and 194. 1min/day was saved 12 assistants in the dept. Conclusion The video of OHI was useful in dental clinic and made high clinical efficiency,meanwhile,it will be used widely in dental teaching fields.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.103.40