“都市叙事群”与“非西方的现代性”——兼论李欧梵《上海摩登》的颓废观与现代文学学科的关系  

The “Urban Narrative Group”and “Non-Western Modernity”: On the Relation between the Concept of Decadence in Leo Ou-fan Lee's Shanghai Modern and Modern Literature as a Discipline as well

作　　者：夏伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学人文学院,上海200240

出　　处：《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第2期16-23,151,共8页Journal of East China Normal University（Humanities and Social Sciences）

摘　　要：《上海摩登》曾被误解为"官方主流意识形态的‘代言者’",其实却是严肃的学术著作,其贡献在于:打捞起了因"颓废"问题而被"80前"中国现代文学学科长期忽视的以施蛰存与穆时英为代表的"都市叙事群",并通过对"都市叙事群"的研究发现了"身份—性压抑"与"批判性缺失"两种"摩登上海"独具的"非西方的现代性",从而证实了通过现代文学来研究现代性问题的可行性。Shanghai Modern was once misunderstood as a'spokesperson'of the official mainstream ideology,but it is in fact a serious academic work. Its contributions can be described in such a way: it uncovers the 'urban narrative group'represented by Shi Zhecun and Mu Shiying,which has been ignored in modern Chinese literature as a discipline before 1980s due to the 'decadence'; it discovers two typical 'non-Western'modernity in modern Shanghai,that is,'identity depression'and 'criticism deficiency',so that it illustrates a feasibility of examining modernity through modern literature.

关 键 词：李欧梵 施蛰存 穆时英 “80前”现代文学学科 现代性 颓废 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]