机构地区:[1]河北省人民医院肿瘤一科,河北石家庄050051
出 处:《中华肿瘤防治杂志》2014年第8期594-598,共5页Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
基 金:河北省科技支撑计划(11276103D-70)
摘 要:目的:探讨乳腺浸润性导管癌(invasive ductal carcinoma,IDc)中成纤维细胞生长因子受体1(fibroblast growth factor receptor1,FGFRl)和乳腺癌扩增性抗原1(amplified in breast cancer 1,AIBl)的表达,分析两者与乳腺IDC临床特征的关系以及两者的相关性。方法:采用免疫组织化学SP法检测2006—01-01—2011-06-30河北省人民医院100例经病理科医师确诊、临床病例资料完整的乳腺IDC组织石蜡标本中FGFRl及AIBl的表达情况,分析两者与临床病理特征的关系及两者的相关性。统计所有数据均采用SPSS17.0统计软件进行分析,采用Y。检验或Fisher确切概率法对同一指标的不同临床病理特征进行比较,应用多因素Logistic回归分析FGFRl及AIBl阳性表达有关的因素,采用Spearman等级相关分析乳腺IDC中FGFRl和AIBl表达的相互关系。结果:FGFRl在乳腺IDC中的阳性表达率为31.oo%,其表达与腋窝淋巴结转移(42.86%珊22.41%)、病理组织学分级(Ⅰ级0,Ⅱ级26.80%,Ⅲ级51.60%)和临床分期(Ⅰ期11.10%,Ⅱ期29.40%,Ⅲ期65.00%)有关,差异均有统计学意义,X^2值分别为4.760、12.463和15.671,P值分别为0.029、0.002和〈0.001;AIBl在乳腺IDC中的阳性表达率为75.00%,与腋窝淋巴结转移与否(83.33%79S68.97%)有关,差异有统计学意义(X^2=4.433,P-0.035),其表达随着病理组织学分级(Ⅰ级38.46%,Ⅱ级75.0。%,Ⅲ级90.32%)和临床分期(Ⅰ期44.44%,Ⅱ期84.31%,Ⅲ~Ⅳ期95.OO%)的增高而逐渐增高,差异均有统计学意义(X^2=13.138,P-0.001;x。=20.336,P〈0.001);多因素Logistic回归分析显示,组织学分级是影响FGFRl及AIBl阳性表达的最主要因素(wald X^2=13.448,P=0.003;wald X^2=7.958,P一0.001)。FGFRl与AIBl表达在乳腺IDC中呈正相关,r-0.237,P-0.017。结论:FGFROBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between the protein expressions of fibroblast growth factor receptorl(FGFR1) and amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of breast and the associa- tions with clinical features. METHODS: S-P Immunohistochemical techniques were adopted to detect the expression of FGFR1 and AIB1 in 100 cases of IDC who were collected from 2006-01-01 to 2011-06-30 in Hebei General Hospital, and had been confirmed by histopathology, with the complete clinical data. SPSS 17.0 statistical software was used for statis- tical analysis. X2 test or Fisher exact Test was used to compare different clinical pathological features of the same parame- ter. Logistic regression analysis was applied for the analysis of positive expression-related factors of FGFR1 and AIB1. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyse the interrelation of FGFR1 and AIB1 in IDC. RESULTS: The positive ex- pression rate of FGFR1 in IDC tissues was 31.00%. The expression of FGFR1 was positively related to the lymph node metastasis(42.86% vs 22.41%), histological grade( Ⅰ grade 0, Ⅱ grade 26.80%, Ⅲ grade 51.60%), clinical stage(Ⅰ staging 11.10 %, Ⅱ staging 29.40 %, Ⅲ-- IV staging 65.00 % ), with statistical significance (X^2 = 4. 760, P = 0. 029 ; Xz = 12. 463, P= 0. 002; X2= 15. 671, P〈0. 001, respectively). The positive expression rate of AIB1 in IDC tissues was 75.00%. The positive expression rate of AIB1 in lymph node positive group was significantly higher than that in lymph node negetive group (83.33 % vs 68.970, X^2 = 4. 433, P = 0. 035), and increased along with the histologic grading ( Ⅰ grade 38.46 %, Ⅱ grade 75.00 %, Ⅲ grade 90.32 % ) and clinical stage( Ⅰ staging 44.44 %, Ⅱ staging 84.31%, Ⅲ -- Ⅳ stag- ing 95.00%), the positive expression rate of FGFR1 increased gradually, and the difference was statistically significant (X^2 = 13. 138, P= 0. 001 ; z = 20. 336, P〈0. 001, respectively). Logistic regression an
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...