检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任喜荣
机构地区:[1]吉林大学理论法学研究中心 [2]吉林大学法学院
出 处:《吉林大学社会科学学报》2014年第3期75-83,173,共9页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家哲学社会科学基金项目(10BFX014)
摘 要:受政治学制度研究传统的影响,中国宪法学曾经长期以制度研究为重心。这一研究取向目前正在经历着转型,即从宏观的政治制度到中观与微观的制度安排、从单向度的制度建构到制度与社会现实的双向互动等。作为学术研究的进行时态,这一研究取向仍然具有独特的比较优势,包括保持学术体系的开放性、提供宪法解释学的新路径、关注基本权利的制度性保障、解决宪法典中的国家基本政策的制度化问题等。在宪法解释学的发展缺乏司法实践推动力的背景下,关注宪法中的制度安排、宪法权利的制度保障、宪法政策条款的制度化,显然是一种实事求是的实践唯物主义态度。Chinese constitutional research has been focusing on the study of state institution for a long time. 'The institution-focused constitutional research'is a fact proposition and a value proposition as w ell. As a fact proposition,it reveals the long-standing tradition of institution-focused research and its undergoing shifting; as a value proposition,it reveals its desirability and feasibility to the development of Chinese constitutional research and to Chinese constitutional practice under rule of law of modern China. Institution-focused constitutional research has important academic influence and unique comparative advantages in the present,including: maintaining the openness of the academic system; provide new path to the interpretation of the Constitution; emphasize the institutional protection of fundamental rights; figure out the institutionalization of public principal policy in the Constitution. Without the impetus of judicial review,emphasizing the institutional arrangements in the Constitution,the systematic protection of constitutional rights,the institutionalization of constitutional public policy,is clearly a practical materialism approach.
分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.182.56