检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]平南县人民医院普通外科,广西平南537300
出 处:《结直肠肛门外科》2013年第6期373-375,共3页Journal of Colorectal & Anal Surgery
摘 要:目的旨在对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术与传统形术式的近期疗效的对比分析,探讨直肠癌治疗的最佳临床途径。方法选择我院2011年10月至2013年2月间收治的40例行腹腔镜根治术的直肠癌患者作为研究组;选择40例同期行传统开腹直肠癌根治术且有可比性的患者作为对照组,并对相关临床资料进行对比分析。结果研究组1例中转开腹;且研究组的术中出血量、切口长度、肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但两组手术时间、淋巴结数目清扫无较大差异,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜直肠癌根治术具有较高的安全性及可行性;其近期治疗效果均优于传统开腹根治术。Objective To comparative analyze the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection with the traditional form of surgical to explore the optimal treatment for colorectal cancer.Methods 40 patients with rectal cancer were chosen from October 2011 to February 2013 in our hospital.40 patients treated with laparoscopic radical surgery were selected as study group,and 40 patients in the same period treated with laparotomy were selected as control group.Results One case in the study group had laparotomy.There are evident advantage of the study group in blood loss,incision length,intestinal function recovery time,operative time and postoperative hospital stay than the control group (P 〈0.05).On the other hand,there are no difference in operation time and the number of lymph node dissection between the two group (P 〉0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection is safe and feasible,and the short-term efficacy are better than traditional laparotomy
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170