信用证欺诈的认定标准与止付令下达依据——中、英、美不同法律视角的比较研究  

Identification Matter of Credit Card Fraud and Issuing Basis of Stop Order: Comparative Studies in Different Legal Perspectives of China,UK and USA

作　　者：陆璐[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院

出　　处：《江海学刊》2014年第3期216-220,239,共5页Jianghai Academic Journal

摘　　要：最高人民法院2005年出台的《关于审理信用证纠纷案件若干问题的规定》,旨在规范信用证纠纷案件的法律适用,然其第8条虽以列举的形式规定了法院可下达止付裁定的信用证欺诈的情形,但因"信用证欺诈"认定标准不清晰,造成有关止付令发布条件的规定过于宽泛,严重曲解了信用证相关法规和国际惯例的规定,背离了信用证的独立性、安全性及高效性特征。英美法对信用证欺诈例外的严格适用和止付令的谨慎下达,可为我国立法司法所借鉴。'The Provision for Letters of Credit Disputes'published in 2005 may be seen as the main legal terms for documentary credits. Although Article 8 listed the circumstance of fraud exception,the criterion for the application of fraud rule is still not clear,making the issuing condition of stop order too general,the vagueness of the criterion also misinterprets the legal rules and international conventional regulations and is against the characteristics of being independent,safe and efficient. The strict applicability of credit fraud exception and the carefulness of issuing stop order in UK,USA and France can be good lessons for Chinese legislation justice.

关 键 词：信用证 欺诈例外 止付令 

分 类 号：D924.35[政治法律—刑法学] D925.1[政治法律—法学]