浅析美国未成年人案件社会调查制度  

Explorations on Juvenile Social Investigation Mechanism in the United States

作　　者：张鸿巍[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西大学法学院,广西南宁530004

出　　处：《河北法学》2014年第5期130-138,共9页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：2013年国家社科基金青年项目资助课题<未成年人附条件不起诉的社会支持机制实证研究>(13CFX059);国际救助儿童会(英国)北京代表处资助课题<儿童监护的司法干预机制与配套儿童福利制度研究>阶段性成果

摘　　要：为实现美国少年司法对问题少年安置的个别化处分,社会调查及其由此而来的社会调查报告对于法官作出适当安置决定至关重要。通常来说,缓刑官会承担社会调查的重任并据此向法官提交书面报告,而法官则大体倾向于采纳这份报告提出的安置建议。然而,随着对问题少年归责性的日益强调,未成年人案件社会调查涉及内容愈加全面,在关注问题少年特殊利益之余,亦加大了对被害人影响陈述及防卫社会的关注。To achieve the individualized treatment for the troubled youth in American juvenile justice, the social investigation and resulting social investigation reports are essential for judge to make appropriate dispositions. Typically, the probation officer will bear the heavy responsibility of social investigation and hereby submit a written report to the judge, and judge generally tends to accept the corresponding recommendations. However, with the increased emphasis to troubled youth＇s accountability, there also increased concerns about the victim impact statement and community protection in conducting social investigation, in addition to juvenile＇ s special interests.

关 键 词：美国少年司法 社会调查 社会调查报告 功能及价值 检视与反思 

分 类 号：DF793[政治法律—诉讼法学]